Unequal Pain and the City’s Search for a Steward
Posted on Friday, January 25 2008 by Heather Brandon
While Connecticut Governor M. Jodi Rell announced on Wednesday that the state’s budget surplus currently stands at $263.2 million, Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick is counting on $800 million in revenue from casino licensing fees to inject $124 million into his recently-announced 2009 budget recommendations when casinos are not (yet) legal in the state.
A press release this week from Patrick’s office outlines the budget priorities; the Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center also offered up a preliminary analysis. The release notes that $88 million in casino licensing fees would go back to cities and towns for transportation infrastructure improvements, plus another $88 million in property tax relief. Perhaps the state of Massachusetts could appeal to the state of Connecticut for a grant.
As Patrick put it in his state of the Commonwealth address last night (pictured; see video here; audio here; full text below), “The poor are in terrible shape. And the middle class are one month away from being poor, and deeply anxious about it. …[O]vershadowing all of this is widespread unease about the national economy, because credit and housing markets are especially fragile right now.”
Josh Goodman wrote in a blog post today at Governing.com, “It’s not that the problems facing the economy or facing state governments have been overstated, but rather that the pain is being felt unequally.”
Some states, Goodman wrote, are feeling the economic pain acutely, while others seem to be rolling in dough, or at least not seeing any major damage. Goodman pointed readers to a recent Washington Post article, “An Economy’s Mixed Message on Suffering,” by Neil Irwin. From that piece:
While unemployment is rising and consumers are falling behind on their bills in such highly populated states as Florida, California and Michigan, most other states appear to be doing fine. Construction workers are on unemployment lines, but engineering and consulting firms are in bidding wars for staff members. …
The economic damage appears to be concentrated in hotbeds of the mortgage crisis, states that also include Arizona and Ohio. In June, Nevada had the same unemployment rate as the country as whole, 4.6 percent. By November, joblessness had risen to 5.4 percent in Nevada, another of those heavily affected by the housing crunch. Nationally, the November unemployment rate rose to 4.7 percent.
With the state’s prospects seemingly dim and yet not as dim as some states, where does that put Massachusetts with respect to national priorities? Some city mayors, wisely perceiving they can’t necessarily rely on governors to give them a hand with funding priorities, go to Washington themselves to hobnob with elected officials, as Hartford Mayor Eddie Perez did this week with his visit to the US Conference of Mayors winter meeting. Connecticut cities appeared well-represented there, with officials from Bridgeport, Fairfield, Hartford, New Haven, Norwalk and Stamford all registered to attend. Registered from Massachusetts? Only the mayors of Boston, Haverhill and Somerville. While the networking opportunities offer no panacea, can a struggling and neglected city afford to ignore the potential?
In a press release (PDF) yesterday, the mayors called on Congress and the lending industry to “help mitigate the economic distress of the mortgage crisis by reducing the number of foreclosures, helping borrowers facing foreclosures now and stabilizing neighborhoods suffering from vacated, foreclosed properties.” Such requested action also included increasing Community Development Block Grant funding “to help stabilize neighborhoods that are suffering from the negative effects of foreclosures on surrounding properties and neighborhoods.”
If Springfield is waiting on the state or its elected officials to advocate for its needs on the economic front, it may be a long wait indeed, although it’s helpful that Governor Patrick recently appointed city resident Elizabeth Cardona to head up his newly-opened regional office in the city at 436 Dwight Street, which had been shuttered for years.
Some have complained that the people elected to the state legislature from the Springfield region do not represent the needs and interests of the city itself, but such complaints don’t seem to have any significant effect on electoral results. Likewise, some city officials who are hired or appointed, not elected, have said to me that their efforts to reach out to the eastern portion of the state are met with hardship and seemingly deaf ears. A common refrain: “They hardly know we exist.”
Freshman State Representative Angelo Puppolo, who office is in Wilbraham, is a former Springfield City Councilor, and now represents portions of the city at the state level. In addition to accomplishments he lists at his Web site, Puppolo has also passively generated buzz around a controversial billboard (pictured below) in Springfield last fall, viewable from I-91 for several weeks.
This stands in contrast to buzz around any particular advocacy work of Puppolo’s on the city’s behalf, such as his petition for a special commission to investigate possible reimbursement to cities and towns for state-mandated busing. City Councilor Timothy Rooke said in a Springfield Intruder blog comment that such reimbursement, plus lottery money the city did not receive over three years, “almost totals the loan amount we received from the state to bail out” the city when a control board was imposed by former Governor Mitt Romney. When and how that money is paid back to the state is still up for debate, but it’s a significant and challenging issue given the current status of the city’s funds.
The controversy over the billboard and the perceived threat to Puppolo’s staying power in the legislature has enough gravitational pull, apparently, to bring Governor Patrick to the city in a show of support.
The billboard was an attack on Puppolo last fall for his vote in support of gay marriage. At the time, Talk2Action’s Fred Clarkson wrote up a blog piece about the controversy, including an email appeal from Puppolo for support; a blog post from MassResistance labeled Puppolo as “paying the price for lying to voters,” and Blue Mass Group’s David Kravitz took the opportunity to call it “a sorry development in Springfield.”
An event at the city’s Basketball Hall of Fame next week has been planned to offer support from Governor Patrick in Puppolo’s interest, including a suggested contribution of $100 “to raise funds to fend off more attacks and an anticipated attempt to unseat him by this or other groups,” according to an email issued by Progressive Democrats of Massachusetts in Greater Springfield, which has “rallied behind” Puppolo after his “courageous stand on equal marriage led to a spate of rage from local and out-of-state hate groups.”
The event is set for Wednesday, January 30, from 6:00 to 8:00 pm at Center Court (pictured).

Below is the text of the governor’s address last night.
Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick’s State of the Commonwealth Address, January 24, 2008
Lieutenant Governor and Constitutional Officers, Madame President, Mr. Speaker and all of the Members of the Legislature, Chief Justice and Members of the Judiciary, Members of the Cabinet who are here, Elected Officials, Reverend Clergy, Distinguished guests, And above us all, the People of the Massachusetts.
Thank you all for being together tonight.
At the outset, and on behalf of the People of Massachusetts, let us all thank the members of the military from Massachusetts serving so honorably in Iraq and Afghanistan. We are proud of you and humbled by your service. On a personal note, Diane and I want to thank the People of Massachusetts for the extraordinary kindnesses and support you have shown us on a personal level. I’ll never forget it. It is an honor to serve you.
Our youngest daughter graduated from high school this past spring. And when I sat at her graduation, swollen with pride like every other parent, I couldn’t help but reflect on the difference between her journey to that milestone, and my own to a similar milestone more than 30 years before.
You know my story. I grew up in poverty on the south side of Chicago. I went to broken and over-crowded schools. I can’t think of a time when I didn’t enjoy reading, but I don’t ever remember actually owning a book. I got my own bed for the first time in my life when I came east on a scholarship to a boarding school in 1970. In that and so many other ways, coming to Massachusetts was like landing on a different planet.
Now Katherine, by contrast, has always had her own room. By the time she got to high school, she had already traveled on three continents, she knew how to pronounce and use a “concierge,” and she had shaken hands in the White House with the President of the United States.
Diane and I talked easily and comfortably with our kids about college when the time came and organized visits for them to campuses all over the country. When I called home 35 years ago to tell my family I was admitted to Harvard, my grandmother asked, “Where is that, anyway?”
One generation. One generation and the circumstances of my life and family were profoundly transformed. That story is not unlike many of yours in this room or elsewhere in this Commonwealth. And though that story is still not told often enough still, it is told more often in this country than any other place on earth. That is the American Story.
For most of us, that story was made possible by a good education, great opportunities to work and develop our skills, and adults who involved themselves in our lives in key moments and ways.
That is our agenda: schools, jobs and civic engagement. That’s what will make the American Story real again in this Commonwealth.
So, in 2007, we started to connect those aspirations to actions, and our actions to people. We are off to a very strong start. Massachusetts is on the move.
Last year we increased support for local schools by the highest amount in history. Because we also invested in pre-K, all-day kindergarten and longer school days, over 43 thousand children got the lifetime benefit of a strong academic start, and 9 thousand students had more time with teachers for both core studies and enrichment programs. We added millions for science, technology, engineering and math grants, as well, to start giving our kids the skills they need to excel in tomorrow’s global economy.
And our students are responding. Last year Massachusetts students took top scores in all four categories measured on the National Assessment of Educational Progress, the so-called “national report card.” My friends, Massachusetts is on the move.
We improved the conditions for robust economic growth.
We cut approval time for state permits from two to three years to just six months for most new development projects.
We joined the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, and launched new biofuels and green building standards. We won the national wind blade test facility, and supported Cape Wind and other clean power projects. As a result, the clean technology sector has become one of the strongest growth industries in the Commonwealth and one of the most promising in the world.
Ten new movies were produced last year, thanks to the new Film Tax Credit, and cultural facilities are being restored. What does that mean? It’s providing new jobs for workers in our creative economy and bringing over $200 million in new economic activity to the Commonwealth.
Our China mission produced sales agreements for life sciences and medical device companies; research exchanges between UMass and China’s premier universities; and new nonstop air service between Boston and Beijing next year.
And the Massachusetts economy is responding: creating 22,000 new jobs in 2007, out-performing the national average for job creation, and moving from 48th under previous administrations to 15th in the nation last year. Massachusetts is on the move.
Now, strong economies need strong communities. So, we made the largest investment in housing last year in 20 years, including expanding the Affordable Housing Trust Fund and doubling the SoftSecond program, two proven strategies to put home ownership within reach of low- and moderate-income homebuyers.
300,000 adults and children who were uninsured last year are insured today and have access to affordable, reliable to primary care.
We distributed over $50 million in grants to support law enforcement and crime prevention, and nearly doubled funding for new police officers on the street.
We introduced “managed competition,” so that good drivers—whether in Longmeadow or in Roxbury—will see a more than 10 percent drop in their auto insurance rates and far more choices.
From Burgin Parkway in Quincy and Route 12 in Worcester to the Great River Bridge in Westfield, long-awaited repair and public works projects are finally underway. Massachusetts is on the move.
And last June we joined together to keep discrimination out of our Constitution, and leave consenting adults free to marry whom they choose.
So, the state of our Commonwealth is strong, and the evidence of that strength is tangible. My goodness, even the Red Sox, the Celtics and the Patriots are on fire.
For all of these accomplishments and others, for all that we have done together, I thank the Lieutenant Governor and other constitutional colleagues; Senate President Murray, Speaker DiMasi and all the members of the Legislature; the mayors and other local officials; the community leaders and everyday citizens, who have involved themselves in unprecedented numbers; and most especially, my exceptional team. Because of you, all of you, whether in schools, jobs or civic engagement, Massachusetts is on the move.
But there is much more to do. Because the state of our Commonwealth is far better for some than for others.
Parents in many communities still face the painful choice of passing overrides or losing school programs. High drop out rates and achievement gaps persist. There are 125,000 people looking for work in Massachusetts and 90,000 vacancies—jobs that go unfilled because the people who need that work don’t have the skills to do it.
Small business owners are worried about making the payroll or making a living because the cost of insurance or taxes or space is high. Too much talent and too many bright futures were lost last year to gun and gang violence. Too many young families and seniors are still being pushed out of their homes by escalating property taxes, or by extreme adjustments in mortgage rates.
Parents in cities find it hard to dream about college for their kids, and parents in suburbs have nightmares about how to pay for college for theirs.
The poor are in terrible shape. And the middle class are one month away from being poor, and deeply anxious about it. I understand that. And overshadowing all of this is widespread unease about the national economy, because credit and housing markets are especially fragile right now.
Now is not the time for us to lose our focus or our nerve. Government cannot solve every problem in everybody’s life. But government—as an expression of the common interest and the common good—has a role to play in helping people help themselves. And I believe that an agenda based on schools, jobs and civic engagement is not only the way through today’s economic uncertainty, but the way to write tomorrow’s chapter in the American Story. And so I ask you to join with me in partnership to accelerate that agenda in 2008.
Let’s start with education and invest in strategies that work. The budget we submitted yesterday commits a record $223 million more to support public schools. We also propose significant increases in early education grants, all-day kindergarten programs, and extended learning time. Let’s give the 275,000 students and faculty in our public colleges and universities the quality labs, lecture halls and dormitories they deserve.
Support these budget initiatives, pass the higher ed bond bill, and let’s make the American Story their story, too.
On the jobs front, let’s both advance human healing and add another 250,000 jobs over the next decade by passing the Life Sciences Bill next month.
Let’s start promoting efficiency, renewables, cheaper electricity, and new jobs in a hot new growth sector by passing the Energy Bill.
Let’s connect the whole state to the world of ideas and commerce, and jumpstart the economies in western and central Massachusetts, by passing the Broadband Bill.
And with 20 thousand good permanent jobs, 30 thousand construction jobs, a $2 billion boost to our tourism industry, property tax relief for 1 million households, and a steady reliable stream of revenue for cities, towns and the state within our grasp, let’s work together to pass the Resort Casinos bill.
For working people at every level, we can make the American Story their story, too.
Last year, this Legislature created a commission to recommend a practical strategy to end homelessness. The Commission has delivered, and my budget funds their recommendations in full. Join us and let’s set ourselves on a course to end homelessness in Massachusetts once and for all.
Let’s be both tough and smart on crime: tough by limiting illegal access to guns and keeping high-threat gun offenders off the streets; smart by supervising and supporting the 97 percent of inmates who eventually return to society, and by using CORI information wisely instead of haphazardly. Let’s work together to pass an effective Anti-Crime Package this spring.
And finally, let’s give our cities and towns the tools they need to keep property taxes down and to provide the services our neighbors want by passing the Municipal Partnership Act in full. All of our communities, all of our communities deserve a chance at the American Story too.
Rest assured: We can afford everything we have proposed. Between the savings and spending limits we have imposed, the revenue from closing a few gaps in our tax code, a responsible portion of new casino licensing fees, and some restraint in the use of earmarks, we can afford the high-impact investments we have outlined—as well as a 13 percent cut in the corporate tax rate and property tax relief for nearly half a million households. Even with these investments, our budget holds total spending growth to 3.5 percent, in line with the growth in consensus revenues.
Our economic fortunes are linked, of course, to national and international economic trends and events. In order to assure that we have the benefit of the best economic perspectives, I am announcing tonight the formation of the nonpartisan Governor’s Council of Economic Advisors, to be chaired by former President and CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Cathy Minehan, and consisting of prominent economists and other leaders from local, national and international commerce. They will help us assure that the American Story thrives in Massachusetts.
But invest we must—to keep Massachusetts on the move. That’s the most effective hedge against economic stagnation. With fears of recession looming, how can any of us sit idly by and fail to act? And with the future of the American Story at stake, how can any of us refuse to sacrifice?
For a year now, I have attended the funerals of Massachusetts servicemen and –women killed in Iraq and Afghanistan. Each occasion is profoundly moving. Most of the time the lost soldier, sailor or marine is young. In some cases there is a girlfriend; or a young widow, on one or two of those occasions with a baby the fallen soldier has never even held. You cannot escape the youth: the disbelief of childhood buddies that their friend could be gone so soon; the utter tragedy of parents having to bury a child just entering his or her prime. Still, there is a remarkable lack of bitterness among the families. Only loss and grief and an understanding unspoken that service and sacrifice is sometimes necessary.
We cannot ask these exceptional young people to give what Lincoln called “the last full measure of devotion” to strengthen our community and secure the American future for ourselves, and then balk at making a far less profound sacrifice ourselves to achieve the same ends.
I know that the willingness to serve and to sacrifice is out there. I see it in the new leadership of Commonwealth Corps, our initiative to enlist a broad army of citizens—young, old and in between—offering to give back to their communities. I see it in the Readi Reps, the nearly one thousand grassroots organizers committed to advancing the Readiness Project, our next chapter in education reform. I see it in the willingness of private funders to support crime prevention in urban hot spots and in the young people who are helping me form a Statewide Youth Council, so that their voices can be heard in developing policies that affect their lives.
Everyone must do his or her part, because everyone has a stake. We must do our part as elected officials by managing government responsibly. That includes being willing to curb spending in other areas. Last year I cut some $500 million from state spending, and held spending increases to the lowest level in three years. This year my budget offers another $475 million in cuts. And later this year, through a concept we call MassTrans, I will ask for your support in streamlining our transportation bureaucracy, which will yield further significant savings.
State employees, whose public service I honor and appreciate, must help by sharing a greater burden of their health insurance benefits. Large, multi-state companies, who create opportunity for so many, must help by learning to live in Massachusetts by the same tax rules they live by everywhere else. Even the telephone company must help by paying its fair share of local property taxes so that communities can ease the property tax burden on seniors and on others of limited income.
And as you consider our proposals, and how to support this agenda of schools, jobs and civic engagement, consider also the cost of inaction.
A poor child in high-quality early ed is 40 percent less likely to need special ed or to be held back a grade, 30 percent more likely to graduate from high school, and twice as likely to go to college. The cost of inaction is too high. Just as every new life sciences job creates three to four others in related fields, every lost life sciences job costs us in similar measure. The cost of inaction is too high.
When high tech and clean energy firms leave, or gaming firms shun this market, because we are unwilling to play to our strengths and address barriers to growth, they take thousands of jobs and millions of dollars of investment with them. The cost of inaction is too high. Failure to support cities and towns has led to both cuts in services and hikes in local property taxes. When communities decline, our economy declines. The cost of inaction is too high. Failure to maintain our roads, rails and bridges has left us with a $15 to $20 billion tab over the next 20 years. The cost of inaction is too high.
The people don’t expect us to agree on everything. But they do expect us to engage. They expect us to work together toward the best solution. They expect action. And they deserve it.
I admit that I am an impatient man. I’ve heard that. People say it is because I am from the business world, where things tend to move more quickly once a course is set. Others say it’s because I am a newcomer to Beacon Hill.
Actually, my impatience has nothing to do with any of that. It has to do with the fact that for every one of us from the South Side of Chicago or Worcester or from the North End of Boston, Mr. Speaker, or from Plymouth, Madame President, or from Mattapan or Southie or Springfield or Holyoke or New Bedford or Brockton or Haverhill—for every one of us who has had the blessing of living the American Story, that “one generation” transformation—countless others still wait for their chance. My impatience comes from knowing all the other eager, ambitious, capable, idealistic young boys and girls just like me in places left behind where you and I come from. My impatience comes from knowing up close the costs of inaction.
I went out to visit the Holland School in Dorchester last spring. A few weeks before, a young woman who was visiting her family from out of town was shot and killed. And a couple of weeks after that, an 11-year-old boy found a .44 caliber pistol in the neighborhood and brought it into the classroom. The neighborhood was understandably in an uproar. And so we called a meeting of adults, so that Mayor Menino and I could listen to some of their ideas about ways we could help, and share some of our own.
The meeting convened at the end of the school day, as the kids were leaving the building, heading to their buses or the walk home. I had a minute or two alone in the principal’s office to look over my notes and collect my thoughts before the meeting began. You know how you sometimes realize you’re being watched? When I looked up, there outside the window were a dozen or more little black boys and girls, about this size, backpacks on, beaming, waving, all excited.
When I look into their eyes, the excitement I see is not for the history we made last year, but for the history they have yet to make; not my chance, but theirs. And I see that look—of anticipation and hope—in the eyes of kids in communities all over this Commonwealth. There is a whole generation watching and waiting—some tonight, perhaps—to see whether we see our stake in their future, and act like it. And I say let them look to us, to you and to me, and let us affirm their hope for tomorrow in the actions we take today.
Thank you. God bless you all, and God bless the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.



NoPolitician http://
January 25th, 2008 at 12:17 pmJust a minor point, I think that Angelo Puppolo still lives on South Shore Drive in Springfield. I just checked the deeds and he hasn’t sold that house, nor has he purchased another.
I recall once seeing him listed as D-Wilbraham, but this could be confusion since he took over Gale Canadaras’ seat, and she used to be from Wilbraham.
Heather Brandon http://urbancompass.net
January 25th, 2008 at 12:19 pmI was surprised to see him listed as D-Wilbraham, but the sources for that info were, typically, not local. His office, however, is in Wilbraham, which is probably what that information represents. I will correct the likely error. Thanks.
Bruce Urbschat
January 25th, 2008 at 12:57 pmOne positive note: Massachusetts currently ranks first in lowering its unemployment rate over last year - see http://www.bls.gov/web/laumstch.htm
NoPolitician http://
January 25th, 2008 at 1:31 pmAnother minor point is that Patrick’s FY09 budget contains $124 million from the casino licensing revenues. The total estimated revenue from those licenses is $800m.
Heather Brandon http://urbancompass.net
January 25th, 2008 at 1:37 pmNot being a strong numbers person (as you know, although I do enjoy data), I am having trouble parsing this budget on the casino revenues, so I appreciate the correction. I took out the word “additional” and tweaked the first sentence. Here is the relevant paragraph from the governor’s press release.
NoPolitician http://
January 25th, 2008 at 2:35 pmThe Globe article says:
That’s where my understanding came from. It sounds like the licensing revenues “are expected” to be $800m in FY09, but he only budgeted using $124m of them.
I don’t agree with the casino plan at all; I think they are detrimental to the economics of a region. I think most of the legislature takes that position too. But the inclusion of the money will force the legislature to act one way or another, either by cutting some of the items that Patrick has proposed (like “education” or “public safety”), or by closing more loopholes on businesses (or, as the cynics cry, “raising taxes on business”).
Bottom line: if we want to make improvements in this state, we have to do something differently, either swapping priorities on existing budgetary items, raising taxes on someone, or finding additional revenue via something like a casino. Without any of that, it’s business as usual.
David http://www.b4ufitness.com/
January 27th, 2008 at 8:38 amNoPolitician I think you are right, we have to do something different, what would you do? Is there anyone that is able to think of anyway to fix this political problem?
Belmont
January 27th, 2008 at 9:24 amJust an FYI, Hillary Clinton expected at Hartford City Hall Monday Morning at 9:30, and Springfield City Hall at 11:30.
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/2008-presidential-candidates/hillary-clinton/
Heather Brandon http://urbancompass.net
January 27th, 2008 at 9:34 amThanks for the tip, Belmont. The Courant reported this morning that Clinton will arrive at the Learning Corridor in Hartford, 43 Vernon Street, at 10:00 am for a public event. Doors open at 9:30. The event is in the gym. Parking is reportedly available at the corner of Brownell Avenue and Washington Street.
The paper additionally reported that Clinton will be in Springfield at noon, but the location was not yet determined as of late last night, and the Republican’s news brief on the subject mentioned that such information will be released today.
The reason it seemed like Clinton would be appearing at city halls is because she’s holding a “town hall style” meeting on the economy. She has been delivering a speech at other locations, “Solutions for the American Economy,” so this may be similar.
Heather Brandon http://urbancompass.net
January 27th, 2008 at 11:28 amThe Republican updated its breaking news piece to say Clinton will appear at Springfield College, 263 Alden Street, in Dana Gymnasium at 12:15.
NoPolitician http://
January 27th, 2008 at 4:36 pmWe have three different levels to worry about — local, state, and city.
At a local level, I think we have to continue to fight from becoming the dumping ground of the region. We have to make as much noise as possible when people want to build more homeless shelters, low-income housing, or when we have slumlords making money here. We have to figure out how to foster and help local businesses, and have to train our local residents the best we can. Primarily, we have to figure out how to decrease the scope of work that we need to perform, because we cannot solve the problems we have, nevermind taking on more. I believe the way to achieve that is to get more middle class into the city of Springfield.
On a state level, the state needs to stop supporting policies that encourage economic segregation. It isn’t right for localities to pass laws that prevent certain groups of people, primarily the poor, from ever living in their towns, since both revenues and required services are mostly based on the type of person living within a municipal border. I think the state should also revamp the way it lets communities raise revenue — property taxes are the only tool, but that creates winners and losers. A scheme must be developed to allow communities to raise revenue based on their strengths. If Springfield wasn’t dependent on the state for so much aid, I think that we would have a much better collective psyche.
On a national level, we must be concerned both with trade and concentration of wealth. Although people say that globalization is either overhyped or “here to stay”, it is an effective stick against progressive actions here — anyone gets too uppity and the threats to “move overseas” come out. Every business owner should desire a country where a lot of people have a good amount of money, rather than a few people having most of the money. There are more customers that way, it’s easier to make a buck selling to 200 million potential customers then 5 million.
I wish I could get a question to Senator Clinton. I’d ask her “our country’s economy has changed so that only those with the most education have a chance at a better life, and unskilled workers are now competing directly with workers from across the globe. What can we do to allow someone not capable of an advanced degree, yet someone willing to work their fair share, to also share in the American Dream?”
This is a very important question, because if you look at our economy today, it is nothing like that of America’s golden era, where simply putting in a honest day’s work allowed someone to buy a home and support their family, usually on a single income. Our country more closely resembles the USA of the 1890’s, the “robber baron” era, with vast concentrations of wealth at the top, but crumbs for everyone else.
Heather Brandon http://urbancompass.net
January 29th, 2008 at 10:46 amThanks, NoPolitician, for these thoughts.
On a separate note:
According to an email circulated by Corinne Wingard, Hampden County Coordinator for the Barack Obama campaign, Governor Patrick will be in Springfield to do a standout tomorrow evening just prior to the Puppolo event at the Hall of Fame.
The standout is planned for 5:00 to 6:00 pm at the corner of State Street and Homer Street, with a simultaneous phone bank going on inside AIC’s Cultural Arts Center. The governor is expected to be present for the duration, greeting people at the standout and at the phone bank.
Parking is said to be available at the Homer Street School as well as at the AIC lot at Maynard and State Streets.