Springfield Preps Auction for Several Properties; Site Tours This Sunday
Posted on Friday, April 4 2008 by Heather Brandon
Springfield is preparing to auction off around 30 properties at a City Hall event on the evening of Monday, April 14. Registration begins at 5:00 pm, and the auction is scheduled to start an hour later.
A week prior to the auction, on Sunday, April 6, the city is planning open houses and site tours from 11:00 am to 1:00 pm. It’s a great opportunity to get inside buildings you may have wondered about in the past.
A number of properties with promise are planned for inclusion on the auction block, such as four residential condominium units, some single-family homes, a Taylor Street commercial building (PDF, also pictured at right), a spacious two-family colonial, and several residential-zoned land parcels.
One unit, in Museum Park apartments at 70 Chestnut Street (pictured), is directly across from the city’s quadrangle green at the Springfield Museums, including the soon-to-be-constructed Springfield Museum of Firsts (top middle in aerial photo), as well as the downtown central library.
Quincy-based Daniel J. Flynn & Co. is once again handling the ballroom-style auction, the second of its kind this calendar year. The auctioneer is also hosting the open house at the various properties. “Folks shouldn’t miss this one,” auctioneer Dan Flynn said in a prepared statement from the city. “At the last city auction, people were pleasantly surprised at how low some of the winning bids were.”
Tina-Marie Quagliato, Senior Program Manager in the city’s Office of Housing, noted that Flynn & Co.’s representation at the open house locations will give prospective buyers a good opportunity to have any questions answered, either regarding the locations themselves or the auction process.
“I think some of the properties have some really great selling points,” she added, particularly the condo units for first-time homebuyers. Quagliato provided photos of the condo interiors for anyone potentially interested, as well as some highlights of a few other properties.
“Buying tax title property through the auction process has some really great advantages,” she said. “The main advantage is that you get good property at a bargain price.” All are listed at the Flynn & Co. Web site for perusal.
The unit at 70 Chestnut Street, #608 (kitchen pictured), is in the recently-renovated Museum Park apartment building downtown. The living area for the unit is listed at 290 square feet with an assessed value of $19,900.
“The unit itself is a studio,” Quagliato said, “but as you can see, I have also have included pictures of the common areas that have been created to expand the living space. It allows for a community atmosphere to develop in the building.”


Museum Park apartments are generally geared for people 55 and older. The building is managed by WinnCompanies, which has an excellent management reputation.
It is within close walking distance of the central business district and is in a neighborhood served by the Armoury-Quadrangle Civic Association. AQCA meetings have, on occasion, taken place in the building’s community room, or just down the street in the lobbies of other buildings nearby on Chestnut at the Apremont Triangle.
While not yet an area brimming with vitality, it’s a place with strong investment potential in my opinion, relatively speaking, whether for commercial or residential purposes.
The Urban Land Institute had similar things to say about this specific neighborhood in its year-old advisory services panel report (PDF) on the city. (See pages 33 and 34.)
There are also two one-bedroom condo units, #5A and #5E, available in the McIntosh building (pictured), a handsome former shoe factory at 158-166 Chestnut Street.
The building is at the corner of Worthington Street in the city’s downtown entertainment district. Unit 5A was assessed at $100,900; unit 5E has a value of $86,700.
“Both are very spacious units,” Quagliato said of these, “[with] exposed wood and brick work from the original use of the building, which gives them a very cozy feeling.”
Another condo unit, #7B in a building at 116-120 Longhill Street, is adjacent to the soon-to-be-redeveloped Longhill Gardens Condominiums.
The building was constructed in 1920. Unit 7B has a living area of 980 square feet and has an assessed value of $75,300. It includes a recently remodeled bathroom and kitchen.

According to Quagliato, who was very impressed with this unit, the bathroom and kitchen and their appliances “appear to have hardly been used.”
She noted the building’s great location near the Forest Park Heights Historic District, also within close range to the park itself, downtown by bike or bus, and I-91.
“The units on Longhill Street and in the McIntosh building are really great opportunities for first time homebuyers,” Quagliato emphasized, “especially ideal for those who want to own their own home, but don’t have the time or the opportunity to worry about the maintenance owning a home requires.”
The large two-family colonial house at 120-124 Leyfred Terrace, also in Forest Park, has “the potential to be a beautiful home again,” according to Quagliato.
“The city has been trying to foreclose on the property for some time,” she added, “and we’ve finally been able to get ownership of it. We’re very optimistic that a good purchaser will step in, and put the necessary care and work into the property.”
Consisting of 3,836 square feet of living space on 11,718 square feet of land—a double lot—the home has been assessed at a value of $176,000. “It was actually constructed as a duplex,” Quagliato said, “which is sort of unique for that style of home.”

In comments following a post here last December about the closing-off of a street at Bellevue Avenue and Marengo Park not far from Leyfred Terrace, city resident Sheila McElwaine noted this particular property. “It has been empty for so long that rehab would cost more money than could be realized by resale,” she wrote. “Yes, rehab is possible (within limits to be sure), no matter how badly damaged a building may be, but without a philanthropist with very deep pockets, the numbers must work.”
McElwaine wrote further that the non-profit neighborhood group Concerned Citizens for Springfield had been putting its resources toward keeping the property boarded and free of debris in the yard. Now that the city is auctioning it off, it will be interesting to watch what happens next.
Below is the city’s March 27 press release promoting the auction. The city provides more information and necessary documentation in anticipation of the auction on its Web site.
Second Auction Planned for City of Springfield
The City of Springfield in conjunction with Daniel J. Flynn & Co. of Quincy will auction off 30 properties in tax-title possession on Monday, April 14, 2008. Registration begins at 5:00 pm and the auction begins at 6:00 pm. The Auction will be conducted ballroom-style, at Springfield City Hall located at 36 Court Street, Springfield, MA 01103.
This marks Springfield’s second real estate auction in 2008. The first auction held on January 17 was well attended and widely considered a success. The auction exceeded the goal of getting at least $500,000 for the properties according to city officials.
“We’re expecting another sizable turnout,” said Acting City Treasurer/Collector Patrick Burns. “These auctions have proven to be a highly effective method of generating tax dollars for the city while, at the same time, providing a desirable service for those seeking development opportunities.”
The auction portfolio for the upcoming April 14 auction offers a variety of opportunity for investors; a commercial building on Taylor Street, a 3,836 square foot, two-family colonial, four single-family homes, four residential condominiums units and several residential zoned land parcels.
“Folks shouldn’t miss this one. At the last city auction people were pleasantly surprised at how low some of the winning bids were,” Auctioneer Dan Flynn remarked.
He added: “Municipal auctions are attractive because, unlike foreclosure auctions, there are no liens. What you bid is what you pay plus the five percent buyers’ premium.”
A five percent buyer’s premium covers the auction fee so the cost is added to each high bid which represents the final sale price. Anyone interested in participating in the auction should come prepared with a certified or bank check made out to them.


Ralph Slate http://www.springfield-history.com
April 4th, 2008 at 4:09 pm116-120 Longhill Street is actually not in the Forest Park Heights Historic District. It is the first property outside the district.
However, the building is certainly worthy of being in the district (except for its white vinyl windows - brown would have looked so much better!), and with the potential for no more apartments on that side Longhill Street, and, if the city can negotiate it, maybe some off-street parking for it on the land formerly occupied by Longhill Gardens, it could be a very desirable location. If they would ever cut down those huge hedges in front of the building and landscape it a little bit, it would be even better!
Heather Brandon http://urbancompass.net
April 4th, 2008 at 4:24 pmThanks for the correction; so noted.
Sheila McElwaine http://!?
April 4th, 2008 at 4:31 pmNice to see inside those apartment buildings. The units looks great, especially the one on Longhill Street with what looks like a fireplace and little balcony.
Ralph, if the owners of 116-12- Longhill Street wanted to petition for inclusion in the Historic District, could they do so?
Ralph Slate http://www.springfield-history.com
April 4th, 2008 at 9:30 pmYes, the owners (or in this case, the condo association) could petition. The complexity of getting it done would depend on whether the property was surveyed for historical significance in the past. If it was not, then the survey would need to be done, and then forwarded to Massachusetts Historic Commission, who would make a recommendation.
Assuming the SHC agreed with the expansion of the district, it would then go to the city council. A 2/3 majority vote is necessary to create or extend the district.
I’m not sure the exact power that the MHC has over the process, if they can “veto” the expansion. All documents I’ve seen mention “endorsements” or “recommendations”.
There is probably little downside for that building to be included in the district; they have already replaced their windows, and since the building is brick, there’s not much you can change on the exterior. Then again, the MHC might consider that to be too big a change to the exterior to recommend their inclusion. Hard to say. But I’d fully support that if the owners were interested.
I still think that Leyfred Terrace would be a great addition to the district. The houses there are unique, architecturally, in the city, particularly those large duplexes — some are 2,500 square feet in size on each half. Here’s a link to photos of houses on Leyfred that I’ve gathered from realtor sites. It’s such a shame that there are so many problems on that street, it’s so beautiful, particularly the streetscape, with the way the houses are set so high on the street.
Problem is, that street definitely was never surveyed, and it costs somewhere in the range of $200 per structure to do a survey, so that street, with maybe 50 houses, would run $10,000, and there are far more historically relevant properties to be surveyed in the city, even though those won’t lead to district creations. Even then, there is currently no money available to do this, though we could lobby for it.