<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Urban Compass</title>
	<atom:link href="http://urbancompass.net/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://urbancompass.net</link>
	<description>Searching the soul of the city</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 23:35:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Former Swift Factory Redevelopment: A Thesis Project by Real Hartford &#187; Optimism Reigns in Update on City</title>
		<link>http://urbancompass.net/?p=2749&#038;cpage=1#comment-678966</link>
		<dc:creator>Real Hartford &#187; Optimism Reigns in Update on City</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 23:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbancompass.net/?p=2749#comment-678966</guid>
		<description>[...] Ave to the $500,000 that he said has been secured for environmental remediation of the former Swift Factory. The new public safety complex on High Street, which has its opening ceremony scheduled for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ave to the $500,000 that he said has been secured for environmental remediation of the former Swift Factory. The new public safety complex on High Street, which has its opening ceremony scheduled for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Experts Recommend Branding, Focusing Farmington Avenue in Hartford by Brian</title>
		<link>http://urbancompass.net/?p=2922&#038;cpage=1#comment-319134</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 21:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbancompass.net/?p=2922#comment-319134</guid>
		<description>Very interesting, particularly the branding recommendation. Here in DC, neighborhoods/business improvement districts are huge, and each has there own branding for better (http://www.georgetowndc.com) or worse (http://www.mountvernontriangle.org).

Anecdotally, it does seem to make a difference in how residents and visitors view each place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting, particularly the branding recommendation. Here in DC, neighborhoods/business improvement districts are huge, and each has there own branding for better (<a href="http://www.georgetowndc.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.georgetowndc.com</a>) or worse (<a href="http://www.mountvernontriangle.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.mountvernontriangle.org</a>).</p>
<p>Anecdotally, it does seem to make a difference in how residents and visitors view each place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Community Land Trust in Hartford? by Julie</title>
		<link>http://urbancompass.net/?p=2716&#038;cpage=1#comment-289675</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 19:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbancompass.net/?p=2716#comment-289675</guid>
		<description>Speaking as one trapped in a community land trust, I caution AGAINST turning to this model.  Although on paper this seems like a viable solution to community &amp; resident alike, I can assure you it is not.  The wording in the vast majority of Connecticut&#039;s land leases violate HUD&#039;s Fair Housing guidelines making it very difficult for buyers to obtain &quot;legitimate&quot; mortgages (read &#039;prime targets for for sub-prime loans&#039;).  And since the fall-out of the mortgage/bank crisis there are even fewer mortgage companies willing to be involved.  This model of &quot;home ownership&quot; has very little to do with the benefits of ownership and amounts to nothing more than fancy, restrictive renting.  It takes many years (ie. 10 or more) to acquire any equity in the house.  You&#039;re required to pay ALL taxes on the land, however you may not claim ANY equity in its value.  Your liability insurance must also cover that land.  You may not improve the land without permission of the governing board - which means no fences, pools, sheds, etc.  You may not add on to the house you &quot;own&quot; without approval of the governing board - no added family room, garage or bigger kitchen.  And it&#039;s virtually impossible to recapture the value of the cost of any improvements (new siding, new roof, upgraded appliances, upgraded kitchen or bath, etc.) unless you plan on being there the rest of your life.  When the economy &amp; housing market takes a dive, you end up owing more than what it&#039;s &quot;worth&quot; because you do not get any equity in the land and only a small portion of the equity in the house.  And when the economy forces you to go outside your town/city to find employment you find yourself forced to make long commutes (ie. 2 or more hours round-trip) because you are not allowed to rent or lease/sub-lease and it&#039;s next to impossible to sell.  So essentially you have none of the benefits of owning...but all the responsibilities.  And since CHFA no has so many programs available to make true home ownership possible &amp; affordable, it makes this model obsolete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking as one trapped in a community land trust, I caution AGAINST turning to this model.  Although on paper this seems like a viable solution to community &amp; resident alike, I can assure you it is not.  The wording in the vast majority of Connecticut&#8217;s land leases violate HUD&#8217;s Fair Housing guidelines making it very difficult for buyers to obtain &#8220;legitimate&#8221; mortgages (read &#8216;prime targets for for sub-prime loans&#8217;).  And since the fall-out of the mortgage/bank crisis there are even fewer mortgage companies willing to be involved.  This model of &#8220;home ownership&#8221; has very little to do with the benefits of ownership and amounts to nothing more than fancy, restrictive renting.  It takes many years (ie. 10 or more) to acquire any equity in the house.  You&#8217;re required to pay ALL taxes on the land, however you may not claim ANY equity in its value.  Your liability insurance must also cover that land.  You may not improve the land without permission of the governing board &#8211; which means no fences, pools, sheds, etc.  You may not add on to the house you &#8220;own&#8221; without approval of the governing board &#8211; no added family room, garage or bigger kitchen.  And it&#8217;s virtually impossible to recapture the value of the cost of any improvements (new siding, new roof, upgraded appliances, upgraded kitchen or bath, etc.) unless you plan on being there the rest of your life.  When the economy &amp; housing market takes a dive, you end up owing more than what it&#8217;s &#8220;worth&#8221; because you do not get any equity in the land and only a small portion of the equity in the house.  And when the economy forces you to go outside your town/city to find employment you find yourself forced to make long commutes (ie. 2 or more hours round-trip) because you are not allowed to rent or lease/sub-lease and it&#8217;s next to impossible to sell.  So essentially you have none of the benefits of owning&#8230;but all the responsibilities.  And since CHFA no has so many programs available to make true home ownership possible &amp; affordable, it makes this model obsolete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on City of Sleeping Beauties: Springfield&#8217;s Union Station by Miss Helen Hawkins</title>
		<link>http://urbancompass.net/?p=400&#038;cpage=1#comment-224281</link>
		<dc:creator>Miss Helen Hawkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2012 19:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbancompass.net/?p=400#comment-224281</guid>
		<description>I am 86 years old and I have wonderful memories of Union Station. It was not the most ornate building ever built but it was functional and pleasant and very very busy with the trains especially during World War 2. It was well kept as I remember and had 2 or 3 lunch counters, a big dining room, a bakery, a Union News Co. store and long ticket counters for B&amp;M and New Haven RR trains and a baggage check. My great grandaughter showed me these pictures and I was heartbroken to see such a lovely place get run down like this. I am very glad they are fixing it up once again and the Peter Pan and local bus will be there, thats wonderful! I would love to be wheeled in to look when its all done. I didn&#039;t even know there were trains still running, thats good. I think they were upstairs above the station if my memory serves me right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am 86 years old and I have wonderful memories of Union Station. It was not the most ornate building ever built but it was functional and pleasant and very very busy with the trains especially during World War 2. It was well kept as I remember and had 2 or 3 lunch counters, a big dining room, a bakery, a Union News Co. store and long ticket counters for B&amp;M and New Haven RR trains and a baggage check. My great grandaughter showed me these pictures and I was heartbroken to see such a lovely place get run down like this. I am very glad they are fixing it up once again and the Peter Pan and local bus will be there, thats wonderful! I would love to be wheeled in to look when its all done. I didn&#8217;t even know there were trains still running, thats good. I think they were upstairs above the station if my memory serves me right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Urban Fabric by Mourad</title>
		<link>http://urbancompass.net/?p=2880&#038;cpage=1#comment-171375</link>
		<dc:creator>Mourad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 02:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbancompass.net/?p=2880#comment-171375</guid>
		<description>Oh, and don&#039;t the maps from 1960 and 2000 look as though it depicts a cancer that has metastasized over time - YES peeps, surface parking is an urban cancer that is killing our downtown, and we need some aggressive treatment to have any chance of saving this patient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and don&#8217;t the maps from 1960 and 2000 look as though it depicts a cancer that has metastasized over time &#8211; YES peeps, surface parking is an urban cancer that is killing our downtown, and we need some aggressive treatment to have any chance of saving this patient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Urban Fabric by Mourad</title>
		<link>http://urbancompass.net/?p=2880&#038;cpage=1#comment-171370</link>
		<dc:creator>Mourad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 02:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbancompass.net/?p=2880#comment-171370</guid>
		<description>Since the 1960&#039;s following the advent of Constitution Plaza, Downtown Hartford has essentially become a place that can be characterized a glorified office park with some decent restaurants supporting it, and host to the occasional arena event.  Ok there are some highly viable and even world class institutions that make downtown a cultural destination as well, but in that time so much surface parking has eviscerated former human scale structures that gave the city&#039;s center a distinct sense of place.  

There are many details in terms of spacing features such as sidewalks and bump-out etc, the basics of a quality street still remain the same.  Vibrancy comes form having people oriented facades and on BOTH sides of the street so that when you&#039;re walking on one side you can envision yourself at another interesting site on the other side, perhaps on a return trip heading in the opposite direction.  This creates a simple yet powerful dynamic flow of pedestrians that Downtown Hartford lacks as it possesses far far too few of these contiguous stretches when you compare it to a location such as West Hartford Center / BB Square.  Other than tiny Pratt street, there are few examples of a walkable, enjoyable street that mirrors SoHo our Philadelphia&#039;s South Street.

I&#039;m actually a huge booster of Hartford from an activity standpoint - there are many things to do in the city and region, but thanks to the inundation of heinous surface parking, the walking vibe Downtown Hartford has feels  as though IT were one of the cities bombed out in a World War but just hasn&#039;t had the moxie to rebuild yet.  Most shameful is the surface parking lot at the former Oakleaf site on Allyn Street, as the corridor from Union Station to the center commerce district should be replete with structures that invite one to stroll to the streets within the center city, but instead it looks like a pockmarked collection of disjointed buildings that make for a  woeful incomplete street.

I would hope that setting codes and standards for the right type of development can overcome resistance from behemoth parking lot   operations who have failed to properly serve and who have only embarrassed the city with serious price gouging when notable events come to town.

&#039;nuff said...yo

EOM...out</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the 1960&#8242;s following the advent of Constitution Plaza, Downtown Hartford has essentially become a place that can be characterized a glorified office park with some decent restaurants supporting it, and host to the occasional arena event.  Ok there are some highly viable and even world class institutions that make downtown a cultural destination as well, but in that time so much surface parking has eviscerated former human scale structures that gave the city&#8217;s center a distinct sense of place.  </p>
<p>There are many details in terms of spacing features such as sidewalks and bump-out etc, the basics of a quality street still remain the same.  Vibrancy comes form having people oriented facades and on BOTH sides of the street so that when you&#8217;re walking on one side you can envision yourself at another interesting site on the other side, perhaps on a return trip heading in the opposite direction.  This creates a simple yet powerful dynamic flow of pedestrians that Downtown Hartford lacks as it possesses far far too few of these contiguous stretches when you compare it to a location such as West Hartford Center / BB Square.  Other than tiny Pratt street, there are few examples of a walkable, enjoyable street that mirrors SoHo our Philadelphia&#8217;s South Street.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m actually a huge booster of Hartford from an activity standpoint &#8211; there are many things to do in the city and region, but thanks to the inundation of heinous surface parking, the walking vibe Downtown Hartford has feels  as though IT were one of the cities bombed out in a World War but just hasn&#8217;t had the moxie to rebuild yet.  Most shameful is the surface parking lot at the former Oakleaf site on Allyn Street, as the corridor from Union Station to the center commerce district should be replete with structures that invite one to stroll to the streets within the center city, but instead it looks like a pockmarked collection of disjointed buildings that make for a  woeful incomplete street.</p>
<p>I would hope that setting codes and standards for the right type of development can overcome resistance from behemoth parking lot   operations who have failed to properly serve and who have only embarrassed the city with serious price gouging when notable events come to town.</p>
<p>&#8217;nuff said&#8230;yo</p>
<p>EOM&#8230;out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Technical Ticketing: Confusion Over Holiday Parking and Trash Day by Brett</title>
		<link>http://urbancompass.net/?p=2836&#038;cpage=1#comment-151217</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbancompass.net/?p=2836#comment-151217</guid>
		<description>As I understand it, tickets do provide a pretty enormous source of revenue. Recently, Hartford conducted an amnesty day, in which late tickets could be paid without penalty, and I believe they made hundreds of thousands of dollars on that single day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I understand it, tickets do provide a pretty enormous source of revenue. Recently, Hartford conducted an amnesty day, in which late tickets could be paid without penalty, and I believe they made hundreds of thousands of dollars on that single day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
